An official one from Onlinebookclub team:
Diana the Abduction: Mystery Solved is a book under the non-fiction category written by Rania Alammar.
A year after the divorce of Prince Charles and Princess Diana, the princess was killed in a car accident in France in August 31, 1997. The princess, her boyfriend Imad Al Fayed known as Dodi, Dodi’s bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones and the driver and head of security of the Ritz Hotel Henri Paul perished when the Mercedes they were in crashed in the thirteenth pillar of the Pont d’Alma tunnel at 00:23, while being chased by paparazzi. While Henri and Dodi died right away, the princess was taken to the La Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital and died at 4:00 from internal bleeding caused by rupture in pulmonary vein.
There were two main assumptions concerning the event. First, the accident was caused by the recklessness and alcohol intoxication of the driver. Second, the event was a deliberate murder instigated by the Royal Family against Princess Diana who was said to be pregnant by Dodi Al-Fayed at the time of the accident. In this book, the author offered a third conclusion and that is the princess did not die that night but was rather kidnapped and was replaced by the body of a different woman.
The author’s shocking assumption is supported by evidence gathered through several years of research from various investigative books. Among her most important sources are: Cover Up of a Royal Murder: Hundreds of Errors in the Paget Report and How They Murdered Princess Diana, both by John Morgan, Princess Diana: The Evidence by Jon King and John Beveridge and Diana: Death of a Goddess by David Cohen.
The author’s inference was based on multiple discrepancies in recorded information and testimonies, fabricated and otherwise, of involved individuals. Among the most interesting facts pointed out in this book were the following: failure of the cameras to capture a picture of the accident, two different entries of Princess Diana’s time of arrival at the hospital, two different documents of entry for the princess with the same file number, different and inconsistent descriptions of the princess after the accident like terrible injuries and not at all disfigured which led to the author’s assumption that there was another body besides that of Princess Diana.
The book is, first and foremost, interesting and easily catches the attention of the reader as early as the first five pages. The assumptions brought forward, outrageous as they are, are supported by the evidence presented making the author’s arguments very convincing. The fluidity of the writing makes the book easy to read and understand. All the issues raised are thoroughly addressed and the claims substantiated. The event is chronologically narrated giving the reader the feeling of being walked through from the scene of the accident, at the hospital and even in London. The statements are well referenced with sources appropriately cited.
I, therefore, give this book the rate of 4 out of 4 stars. It is interesting, concise and well written. I recommend it, first to the fans of the beloved princess, then to readers who love crime and conspiracy stories.
And from amazon readers:
Von Amazon Customer am 6. Oktober 2016
By Martin Z on 11 Aug. 2016
I have become, and remain, convinced that the crash was the result of a professionally orchestrated ‘plausible denial’ operation.
Rania Alammar is clearly an intelligent journalist, whose conclusion, after having studied a number of books whose authors have investigated the incident, is one she genuinely believes in.
Even for those of us who accept that the ‘accident’ was anything but, followed by an (at least) equally elaborate cover-up there remain many odd inconsistencies, not all of which can be explained by the inevitable confusion following sudden, unexpected, dramatic events.
It’s not unreasonable to set out a case for a possibility that the Princess did not actually die that night, which I had not seriously considered before reading this book.
To her credit its author does not pretend to know what happened to the Princess after September 1st 1997, if she was indeed still alive then, her sedated but living body having been swapped with the body of another, unknown, deceased woman.
But it would have been reassuring to know, when reading, that Ms. Alammar had undertaken some research of her own, rather than basing her conclusion entirely on her studies of other authors published research.
I suspect that English is not her first language, and I’m sorry to say that a few of her sentences make little sense grammatically. More importantly the book is repetitive and not easy to read. It is also shorter than the average book, but to be honest mercifully so.
However I finished it, and, if you are a student of the mystery that she writes about, I recommend that you do too.
Ms Alammar’s assertion that the authorities want/ed us to conclude that the Princess was murdered, rather than that she lost her life in a tragic accident, caused by a speeding drunk driver being pursued by paparazzi, is so blatantly off the mark that I simply cannot understand how she could have concluded that.
Yet clearly she has given a lot of thought to what she writes about, she highlights some very puzzling aspects of what is known about it, and arrives at an original conclusion, which I’m unconvinced by but which merits some serious consideration.
If she is right, her book provides more questions than answers. Maybe she can track down and interview some people who could provide some answers, and write another book, with a more experienced writer to co-author it.
By L Ford on 9 Oct. 2016
By Hawaiian Eye on September 2, 2016
What right does this author have to judge how Mr Al-Fayed took the news of his son’s passing? She was 11 years old and living in another country. Like many people I was in the UK and can tell you the man was devastated. He appeared at his store – Harrods – in shock and dismay, openly weeping. He did not act at all calm and carefree as she suggests. Where does she get this anyway?
Do Diana’s sons need to read this tripe? Even they come under her scrutiny when she claims they laughed on the day they mother died.
Numerous obscure sources and references to articles she’s read online. The author also makes mention of the British royal family covering up numerous family members who suffered mental illness and were confined to private sanatoriums. None of this is new, since documentaries produced over the years also make mention of the Bowes-Lyon sisters.
I am shocked that none of the people mentioned have filed lawsuits because many of the claims in this book are at the very least libelous. I’d give it one star except that I think the author has a cute imagination that would be beautiful for future works of fiction.
By katrina a. noel on August 29, 2016